<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 127 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415361</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant lacked standing, the complaint dismissal by ICAI was upheld, and the report had passed judicial scrutiny. The appellant&#039;s conduct of filing multiple litigations, non-compliance with orders, and abuse of the judicial process were noted. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 50,000 to the Delhi State Legal Service Authority within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:42:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 127 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415361</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant lacked standing, the complaint dismissal by ICAI was upheld, and the report had passed judicial scrutiny. The appellant&#039;s conduct of filing multiple litigations, non-compliance with orders, and abuse of the judicial process were noted. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 50,000 to the Delhi State Legal Service Authority within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>