<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2236 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299105</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the operational creditor&#039;s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the creditor failed to substantiate the claimed debt of Rs. 2.76,54,650. Despite alleging non-payment, the debtor provided evidence of full settlement until 2014, which the creditor acknowledged. The tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence and ruled that the debt was not proven to be owed by the debtor, leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 18:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2236 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299105</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the operational creditor&#039;s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the creditor failed to substantiate the claimed debt of Rs. 2.76,54,650. Despite alleging non-payment, the debtor provided evidence of full settlement until 2014, which the creditor acknowledged. The tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence and ruled that the debt was not proven to be owed by the debtor, leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>