<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1247 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299114</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to provide a copy of the report dated 3.6.2013 within a week. The petitioner was instructed to submit objections within two weeks and granted a hearing, after which fresh orders were to be issued. No costs were to be incurred, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 18:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1247 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299114</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to provide a copy of the report dated 3.6.2013 within a week. The petitioner was instructed to submit objections within two weeks and granted a hearing, after which fresh orders were to be issued. No costs were to be incurred, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>