<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415352</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representations and issue appropriate orders within forty-five days from the receipt of the Court&#039;s order. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition at the time of admission, noting the lack of response from the respondents to the petitioner&#039;s representations. The direction was given in accordance with the law and on merits, with no costs imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415352</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representations and issue appropriate orders within forty-five days from the receipt of the Court&#039;s order. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition at the time of admission, noting the lack of response from the respondents to the petitioner&#039;s representations. The direction was given in accordance with the law and on merits, with no costs imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>