<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27275</link>
    <description>The court interpreted the Wealth-tax Act and ruled that no penalty could be imposed on the legal representative for late filing of the return. It emphasized that liability to file a return arises only when the person is assessable on the valuation date. Additionally, the court clarified that penalties for late filing are based on the last date for filing the return, not on a monthly basis. The judgment favored the assessee, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27275</link>
      <description>The court interpreted the Wealth-tax Act and ruled that no penalty could be imposed on the legal representative for late filing of the return. It emphasized that liability to file a return arises only when the person is assessable on the valuation date. Additionally, the court clarified that penalties for late filing are based on the last date for filing the return, not on a monthly basis. The judgment favored the assessee, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>