<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 101 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s assumption of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act and subsequent order were unlawful. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to limited scrutiny scope and CBDT circulars, concluding in favor of the appellant and quashing the revisional proceedings and orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 101 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s assumption of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act and subsequent order were unlawful. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to limited scrutiny scope and CBDT circulars, concluding in favor of the appellant and quashing the revisional proceedings and orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>