<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 14,53,800/- as notional income was not justified, citing the rule of consistency and the absence of such additions in other assessment years. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to delete the addition, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 14,53,800/- as notional income was not justified, citing the rule of consistency and the absence of such additions in other assessment years. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to delete the addition, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>