<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, directing a re-computation of the disallowance by including investment in subsidiary companies. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to consider the deduction of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess. The appeals from both the Revenue and the Assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, directing a re-computation of the disallowance by including investment in subsidiary companies. The Tribunal also instructed the AO to consider the deduction of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess. The appeals from both the Revenue and the Assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>