<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 88 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s request to be impleaded as a proforma respondent in the Company Petition, advising him to file a petition under the Companies Act, 2013 if eligible. The issues of setting aside interim relief and resuming remuneration were not addressed in this judgment, with the focus being on verifying allegations and the Applicant&#039;s status before making any decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 88 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s request to be impleaded as a proforma respondent in the Company Petition, advising him to file a petition under the Companies Act, 2013 if eligible. The issues of setting aside interim relief and resuming remuneration were not addressed in this judgment, with the focus being on verifying allegations and the Applicant&#039;s status before making any decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>