<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 85 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s observations regarding the Appellant&#039;s disqualification under Section 29(A)(e) of the I&amp;amp;B Code, recognizing the restoration of the Appellant&#039;s Director Identification Number by the High Court. It emphasized the importance of considering the Corporate Debtor&#039;s MSME status and directed the Resolution Professional to evaluate the Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan, allowing submission of a Net Worth Certificate. The Tribunal highlighted the need to support MSMEs and ruled in favor of the Appellant, quashing the previous rejections and allowing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 85 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s observations regarding the Appellant&#039;s disqualification under Section 29(A)(e) of the I&amp;amp;B Code, recognizing the restoration of the Appellant&#039;s Director Identification Number by the High Court. It emphasized the importance of considering the Corporate Debtor&#039;s MSME status and directed the Resolution Professional to evaluate the Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan, allowing submission of a Net Worth Certificate. The Tribunal highlighted the need to support MSMEs and ruled in favor of the Appellant, quashing the previous rejections and allowing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>