<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415301</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, upheld SEBI&#039;s order of attachment and freezing of bank accounts, and declined jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court dismissed the appeal and stay application, granting the appellant the liberty to apply for lifting the attachment order and de-freezing bank accounts through the relevant statutory process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415301</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, upheld SEBI&#039;s order of attachment and freezing of bank accounts, and declined jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court dismissed the appeal and stay application, granting the appellant the liberty to apply for lifting the attachment order and de-freezing bank accounts through the relevant statutory process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>