<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 90 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27271</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Income Tax Officer was not authorized to levy interest for a delay of less than a month in filing the income tax return, interpreting &quot;month&quot; in alignment with the British calendar. The Court ruled the interest levy under section 139(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unauthorized and illegal, quashing the order and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 90 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27271</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Income Tax Officer was not authorized to levy interest for a delay of less than a month in filing the income tax return, interpreting &quot;month&quot; in alignment with the British calendar. The Court ruled the interest levy under section 139(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unauthorized and illegal, quashing the order and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>