<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 64 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415298</link>
    <description>Repeated invocation of writ jurisdiction to challenge the same tribunal order, after an earlier limited remand and without candid disclosure of prior proceedings, was treated as abuse of process. Applying the equitable nature of Article 226 relief and the requirement of clean hands, the Court refused to entertain the petitions on merits and permitted withdrawal only with exemplary costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 64 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415298</link>
      <description>Repeated invocation of writ jurisdiction to challenge the same tribunal order, after an earlier limited remand and without candid disclosure of prior proceedings, was treated as abuse of process. Applying the equitable nature of Article 226 relief and the requirement of clean hands, the Court refused to entertain the petitions on merits and permitted withdrawal only with exemplary costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>