<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, holding that section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act applies to both &quot;paid&quot; and &quot;payable&quot; amounts. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for a fresh examination, directing consideration of the details and submissions provided by the assessee for determining the disallowance. The order was pronounced on 7th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, holding that section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act applies to both &quot;paid&quot; and &quot;payable&quot; amounts. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for a fresh examination, directing consideration of the details and submissions provided by the assessee for determining the disallowance. The order was pronounced on 7th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>