<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1774 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, ruling in favor of the appellant - Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles as the Corporate Debtor was not given an opportunity to be heard before admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Additionally, the existence of a dispute between the parties prior to the notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rendered the application under Section 9 not maintainable. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, releasing the Corporate Debtor from the insolvency process and its associated restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1774 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, ruling in favor of the appellant - Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles as the Corporate Debtor was not given an opportunity to be heard before admitting the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Additionally, the existence of a dispute between the parties prior to the notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rendered the application under Section 9 not maintainable. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, releasing the Corporate Debtor from the insolvency process and its associated restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>