https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299084 Proceedings under Section 174A IPC based on non-appearance in proclamation proceedings were held unsustainable once the petitioner later appeared before the trial court, obtained bail, and thereby regularised the default. The Court noted that the underlying complaint had already been dismissed for want of prosecution and had not been restored for more than a year. In these circumstances, continuation of the FIR and consequential proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of process of court. The FIR under Section 174A IPC and all consequential proceedings were quashed. en-us Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299084 Proceedings under Section 174A IPC based on non-appearance in proclamation proceedings were held unsustainable once the petitioner later appeared before the trial court, obtained bail, and thereby regularised the default. The Court noted that the underlying complaint had already been dismissed for want of prosecution and had not been restored for more than a year. In these circumstances, continuation of the FIR and consequential proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of process of court. The FIR under Section 174A IPC and all consequential proceedings were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299084