<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 27 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27267</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner-assessee, holding that the audit information did not justify reassessment and that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment. The court quashed the notice for reassessment issued by the Income Tax Officer and restrained further proceedings based on the notice. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 27 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27267</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner-assessee, holding that the audit information did not justify reassessment and that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment. The court quashed the notice for reassessment issued by the Income Tax Officer and restrained further proceedings based on the notice. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>