<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing verification of leave encashment expenses and allowing the appeal on disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) and interest expenditure. However, disallowances for material consumption and repairs and maintenance expenses were upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 08:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing verification of leave encashment expenses and allowing the appeal on disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) and interest expenditure. However, disallowances for material consumption and repairs and maintenance expenses were upheld due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>