<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 40 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415274</link>
    <description>Acceptance of delivery and issuance of a cheque supported liability to pay, and a mere grievance of delayed supply did not excuse payment where the contract conferred no right to withhold payment or cancel the transaction on that ground and no counterclaim for damages was pursued. The territorial objection also failed because part of the cause of action arose in Bengaluru, the defendant participated in the trial, and no prejudice was shown. The decree in favour of the plaintiff was therefore affirmed on the stated grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 08:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 40 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415274</link>
      <description>Acceptance of delivery and issuance of a cheque supported liability to pay, and a mere grievance of delayed supply did not excuse payment where the contract conferred no right to withhold payment or cancel the transaction on that ground and no counterclaim for damages was pursued. The territorial objection also failed because part of the cause of action arose in Bengaluru, the defendant participated in the trial, and no prejudice was shown. The decree in favour of the plaintiff was therefore affirmed on the stated grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>