<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 51 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27261</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rent receipts from members of the club, along with other facilities provided, were not assessable to income tax under the doctrine of mutuality. The judgment emphasized that the club&#039;s receipts were for services and facilities, not just room rent, and were exempt from tax under this principle. Citing various High Court decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Sultan Bros. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT [1964] 51 ITR 353, the court concluded that the receipts in question were not taxable. The reference was answered in the affirmative, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 51 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27261</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rent receipts from members of the club, along with other facilities provided, were not assessable to income tax under the doctrine of mutuality. The judgment emphasized that the club&#039;s receipts were for services and facilities, not just room rent, and were exempt from tax under this principle. Citing various High Court decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Sultan Bros. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT [1964] 51 ITR 353, the court concluded that the receipts in question were not taxable. The reference was answered in the affirmative, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>