https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299049 Section 82 CrPC requires prior judicial satisfaction that the accused has absconded or is concealing himself, publication of the proclamation in the prescribed modes, and a returnable date not earlier than thirty clear days from publication. Because the Magistrate did not record the necessary satisfaction, the proclamation was not shown to have been published in all mandatory modes, and the date fixed for appearance was the same day as publication, the proclamation order was illegal. The declaration of the petitioners as proclaimed persons could not stand, and the consequential proceedings, including the FIR under Section 174-A IPC, were liable to be quashed. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299049 Section 82 CrPC requires prior judicial satisfaction that the accused has absconded or is concealing himself, publication of the proclamation in the prescribed modes, and a returnable date not earlier than thirty clear days from publication. Because the Magistrate did not record the necessary satisfaction, the proclamation was not shown to have been published in all mandatory modes, and the date fixed for appearance was the same day as publication, the proclamation order was illegal. The declaration of the petitioners as proclaimed persons could not stand, and the consequential proceedings, including the FIR under Section 174-A IPC, were liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299049