https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27256 The court upheld the validity of the transfer order under Section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding the reason for the transfer sufficient and adequate. It dismissed allegations of violating natural justice principles and contravening Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, holding that the petitioner had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and that the transfer was in compliance with the law. The writ petition was unsuccessful, and the transfer order was deemed valid, with no costs awarded. A stay of the order was granted orally for three weeks from the judgment date. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:05:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27256 The court upheld the validity of the transfer order under Section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding the reason for the transfer sufficient and adequate. It dismissed allegations of violating natural justice principles and contravening Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, holding that the petitioner had a reasonable opportunity to be heard and that the transfer was in compliance with the law. The writ petition was unsuccessful, and the transfer order was deemed valid, with no costs awarded. A stay of the order was granted orally for three weeks from the judgment date. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27256