<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27255</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the procedural requirements of the amended section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act apply retrospectively. The necessity of obtaining the IAC&#039;s approval for imposing penalties was not required after the amendment. The Tribunal must refer the issue of reasonable cause for the delays in filing returns to the President of the Tribunal for a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27255</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the procedural requirements of the amended section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act apply retrospectively. The necessity of obtaining the IAC&#039;s approval for imposing penalties was not required after the amendment. The Tribunal must refer the issue of reasonable cause for the delays in filing returns to the President of the Tribunal for a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>