<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 20 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415254</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the ITAT on all three issues. Travel expenses were considered accrued liabilities and deductible. The respondent qualified for deduction under Section 80IA as an industrial undertaking, with the deduction applicable despite declared business losses, computed unit-wise. Additionally, the interest on borrowed capital was found to be deductible under Section 36(1)(iii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 20 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415254</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the ITAT on all three issues. Travel expenses were considered accrued liabilities and deductible. The respondent qualified for deduction under Section 80IA as an industrial undertaking, with the deduction applicable despite declared business losses, computed unit-wise. Additionally, the interest on borrowed capital was found to be deductible under Section 36(1)(iii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>