<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299009</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, emphasized the importance of fairness in decision-making by the Resolution Professional (RP) regarding the allocation of voting shares to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in a case involving multiple corporate debtors. The Tribunal directed the RP to ensure impartiality and fairness in allocating the voting share based on the specific corporate debtor involved, rather than the total loan amount of all debtors. The judgment highlighted the RP&#039;s obligation to act objectively and avoid favoritism towards any creditor, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal provisions for a fair insolvency resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 08:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299009</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, emphasized the importance of fairness in decision-making by the Resolution Professional (RP) regarding the allocation of voting shares to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in a case involving multiple corporate debtors. The Tribunal directed the RP to ensure impartiality and fairness in allocating the voting share based on the specific corporate debtor involved, rather than the total loan amount of all debtors. The judgment highlighted the RP&#039;s obligation to act objectively and avoid favoritism towards any creditor, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal provisions for a fair insolvency resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>