https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299018 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld where the accused admitted issuance of the cheques, dishonour, notice, and underlying liability, and was afforded the procedure required under the Criminal Procedure Code. The challenge based on alleged non-compliance with the Evidence Act was rejected because the governing procedure was found in the CrPC provisions applicable to the trial. The appellate enhancement of fine was also sustained, as the sentence was aligned with the admitted cheque liability and treated as compensation to secure payment to the complainant. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Dec 2021 08:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299018 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld where the accused admitted issuance of the cheques, dishonour, notice, and underlying liability, and was afforded the procedure required under the Criminal Procedure Code. The challenge based on alleged non-compliance with the Evidence Act was rejected because the governing procedure was found in the CrPC provisions applicable to the trial. The appellate enhancement of fine was also sustained, as the sentence was aligned with the admitted cheque liability and treated as compensation to secure payment to the complainant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299018