<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1290 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that Respondent No.2 acted ultra vires by removing the Petitioner as Director, staying the implementation of resolutions pending final disposal of the Company Petition. Respondent directed to file a reply within six weeks, with the Petitioner allowed a rejoinder within two weeks. Further hearing scheduled on 21.10.2021 for parties to present arguments effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 08:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1290 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that Respondent No.2 acted ultra vires by removing the Petitioner as Director, staying the implementation of resolutions pending final disposal of the Company Petition. Respondent directed to file a reply within six weeks, with the Petitioner allowed a rejoinder within two weeks. Further hearing scheduled on 21.10.2021 for parties to present arguments effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>