<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27248</link>
    <description>Article 14 permits reasonable classification only where there is an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the statute&#039;s object. Applied to exemption from entertainment tax under the Bengal Amusement Tax Act, 1922, the statutory criterion after amendment was whether the entertainment served a social, educational or scientific purpose. A notification that further divided group theatre, amateur theatre or amateur jatra from professional theatre by reviving considerations of profit motive and artist remuneration was held to have no rational connection with that object. The notification was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27248</link>
      <description>Article 14 permits reasonable classification only where there is an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the statute&#039;s object. Applied to exemption from entertainment tax under the Bengal Amusement Tax Act, 1922, the statutory criterion after amendment was whether the entertainment served a social, educational or scientific purpose. A notification that further divided group theatre, amateur theatre or amateur jatra from professional theatre by reviving considerations of profit motive and artist remuneration was held to have no rational connection with that object. The notification was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>