<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1183 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298999</link>
    <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act may depart from summary procedure where the Magistrate records reasons after hearing the parties that a longer sentence may be required or summary trial is undesirable. An accused has no vested right to insist on a summary trial when the matter has been conducted as a warrant case with full opportunity to participate and cross-examine witnesses. Failure to record the required order before adopting warrant-case procedure is a curable irregularity, not a fatal illegality, unless prejudice or failure of justice is established. A late objection without demonstrated prejudice does not justify a fresh summary trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1183 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298999</link>
      <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act may depart from summary procedure where the Magistrate records reasons after hearing the parties that a longer sentence may be required or summary trial is undesirable. An accused has no vested right to insist on a summary trial when the matter has been conducted as a warrant case with full opportunity to participate and cross-examine witnesses. Failure to record the required order before adopting warrant-case procedure is a curable irregularity, not a fatal illegality, unless prejudice or failure of justice is established. A late objection without demonstrated prejudice does not justify a fresh summary trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>