https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298997 Where a litigant pursues one of two concurrent remedies and fails on merits, the time spent in that proceeding is not ordinarily available for exclusion or condonation under section 5 of the Limitation Act when a later appeal is filed. The court distinguished cases involving review and wrong forum appeals, and held that mistaken legal advice or diligence in pursuing the earlier application did not amount to sufficient cause for delay. The appeal therefore remained barred by limitation, and the preliminary objection succeeded. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:48:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298997 Where a litigant pursues one of two concurrent remedies and fails on merits, the time spent in that proceeding is not ordinarily available for exclusion or condonation under section 5 of the Limitation Act when a later appeal is filed. The court distinguished cases involving review and wrong forum appeals, and held that mistaken legal advice or diligence in pursuing the earlier application did not amount to sufficient cause for delay. The appeal therefore remained barred by limitation, and the preliminary objection succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298997