https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415233 The writ petition raised the effect of the non-constitution of the appellate tribunal and the pre-deposit requirement for a second appeal under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, together with a request to keep recovery in abeyance under a seizure-related order. No final determination on the merits was made. The court directed counter affidavit and permitted rejoinder, and meanwhile stayed recovery of the balance amount in Form GST MOV-9 because the assessed tax had already been deposited. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415233 The writ petition raised the effect of the non-constitution of the appellate tribunal and the pre-deposit requirement for a second appeal under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, together with a request to keep recovery in abeyance under a seizure-related order. No final determination on the merits was made. The court directed counter affidavit and permitted rejoinder, and meanwhile stayed recovery of the balance amount in Form GST MOV-9 because the assessed tax had already been deposited. Case-Laws GST Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415233