<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 993 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing its own order, leading to the impugned order dated 11.06.2021 being set aside. The case was remanded for the Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the matter, ensuring procedural fairness by allowing both parties to be heard. The appeal was allowed, and related interim applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:31:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 993 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing its own order, leading to the impugned order dated 11.06.2021 being set aside. The case was remanded for the Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the matter, ensuring procedural fairness by allowing both parties to be heard. The appeal was allowed, and related interim applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>