<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1693 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298975</link>
    <description>In CA-1047(PB)/2019, the Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan Applicant&#039;s request to increase the plan amount to align a creditor with other secured creditors. Additional funds were infused to address the situation arising from accepting the creditor&#039;s claim, leading to the application&#039;s acceptance and disposal. In CA-966(PB)/2019, the Tribunal determined that an applicant did not qualify as a secured creditor due to the absence of security over the corporate debtor&#039;s assets, resulting in the application&#039;s dismissal. In CA-889(PB)/2019, a decision was pending, while in CA-1081(PB)/2019, the RP committed to paying arrears to an applicant within two days, resulting in the application&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1693 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298975</link>
      <description>In CA-1047(PB)/2019, the Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan Applicant&#039;s request to increase the plan amount to align a creditor with other secured creditors. Additional funds were infused to address the situation arising from accepting the creditor&#039;s claim, leading to the application&#039;s acceptance and disposal. In CA-966(PB)/2019, the Tribunal determined that an applicant did not qualify as a secured creditor due to the absence of security over the corporate debtor&#039;s assets, resulting in the application&#039;s dismissal. In CA-889(PB)/2019, a decision was pending, while in CA-1081(PB)/2019, the RP committed to paying arrears to an applicant within two days, resulting in the application&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>