https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298985 A fresh factual or contractual contention cannot be introduced for the first time in appeal against an order under Section 34 when it was not specifically urged before the court below. The appellate challenge remains confined to the grounds recorded in the impugned order, and a party cannot enlarge its case by relying on belated written submissions or a new clause-based argument. On that basis, the new contention was held not entertainable and the dismissal of the Section 34 petition was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:29:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298985 A fresh factual or contractual contention cannot be introduced for the first time in appeal against an order under Section 34 when it was not specifically urged before the court below. The appellate challenge remains confined to the grounds recorded in the impugned order, and a party cannot enlarge its case by relying on belated written submissions or a new clause-based argument. On that basis, the new contention was held not entertainable and the dismissal of the Section 34 petition was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298985