https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298984 An arbitral award was challenged under Section 34 on two grounds: that the arbitrator did not consider belated written submissions and thereby denied an opportunity to defend, and that a contract between one party and a third party was ignored. The Court noted that the submissions were filed after the deadline and were not served as directed, so their non-consideration did not amount to denial of natural justice where the claim was otherwise decided on the record. It also held that a third-party contract could not govern the parties' own dispute. The award was upheld and the petition was rejected. en-us Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:29:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298984 An arbitral award was challenged under Section 34 on two grounds: that the arbitrator did not consider belated written submissions and thereby denied an opportunity to defend, and that a contract between one party and a third party was ignored. The Court noted that the submissions were filed after the deadline and were not served as directed, so their non-consideration did not amount to denial of natural justice where the claim was otherwise decided on the record. It also held that a third-party contract could not govern the parties' own dispute. The award was upheld and the petition was rejected. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298984