https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298986 The SC recorded a prima facie view that contempt had been committed for non-deposit of amounts directed earlier, but granted one last opportunity to comply within two weeks instead of proceeding further. It also clarified that the earlier judgment did not bar the petitioners from applying under the later office memorandum dated 28.11.2019, and any such application would be considered independently on its own merits. The contempt petition was accordingly disposed of with time for compliance, while the petitioners' right to seek consideration under the office memorandum was preserved. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:29:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298986 The SC recorded a prima facie view that contempt had been committed for non-deposit of amounts directed earlier, but granted one last opportunity to comply within two weeks instead of proceeding further. It also clarified that the earlier judgment did not bar the petitioners from applying under the later office memorandum dated 28.11.2019, and any such application would be considered independently on its own merits. The contempt petition was accordingly disposed of with time for compliance, while the petitioners' right to seek consideration under the office memorandum was preserved. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298986