<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1252 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298963</link>
    <description>A conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable when the proved circumstances form a complete chain pointing only to guilt. The article notes that the Court treated motive, telephonic records, the appellant&#039;s vehicle presence, and recoveries made pursuant to disclosure as interlocking circumstances supporting the prosecution case. The absence of independent recovery witnesses did not, by itself, discredit police evidence. The accused&#039;s failure to give a satisfactory explanation under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reinforced the inference of guilt, and the conviction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1252 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298963</link>
      <description>A conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable when the proved circumstances form a complete chain pointing only to guilt. The article notes that the Court treated motive, telephonic records, the appellant&#039;s vehicle presence, and recoveries made pursuant to disclosure as interlocking circumstances supporting the prosecution case. The absence of independent recovery witnesses did not, by itself, discredit police evidence. The accused&#039;s failure to give a satisfactory explanation under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reinforced the inference of guilt, and the conviction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>