<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 709 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298962</link>
    <description>The appeal was confined to the order passed in Appeal No. E/2184/06, and the HC admitted the matter on the question of law formulated in paragraph 28. The hearing of the appeal was also expedited. No substantive determination on the central excise issue is recorded in the text provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 709 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298962</link>
      <description>The appeal was confined to the order passed in Appeal No. E/2184/06, and the HC admitted the matter on the question of law formulated in paragraph 28. The hearing of the appeal was also expedited. No substantive determination on the central excise issue is recorded in the text provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>