<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 979 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415198</link>
    <description>The challenge to tax summons was not decided on the merits; the HC recorded the respondents&#039; statement that if the petitioner appeared before the concerned officer by the specified date, it would be heard. The petition was disposed of with a direction that the petitioner may file its reply and make submissions on law and merits, and the officer must decide the matter by a speaking order in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 979 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415198</link>
      <description>The challenge to tax summons was not decided on the merits; the HC recorded the respondents&#039; statement that if the petitioner appeared before the concerned officer by the specified date, it would be heard. The petition was disposed of with a direction that the petitioner may file its reply and make submissions on law and merits, and the officer must decide the matter by a speaking order in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>