https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415195 The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid for failing to provide a GST number, as the tender document required its submission and the petitioner was not eligible for exemption. Despite offering higher rent, the petitioner's non-compliance rendered her bid invalid. The court emphasized that comparative rent rates were only relevant for compliant bidders. The successful bidder met all mandatory requirements, including submitting a profit and loss statement, making their bid valid. The court dismissed the petitioner's claims, finding them without merit, and disposed of any related applications. en-us Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415195 The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid for failing to provide a GST number, as the tender document required its submission and the petitioner was not eligible for exemption. Despite offering higher rent, the petitioner's non-compliance rendered her bid invalid. The court emphasized that comparative rent rates were only relevant for compliant bidders. The successful bidder met all mandatory requirements, including submitting a profit and loss statement, making their bid valid. The court dismissed the petitioner's claims, finding them without merit, and disposed of any related applications. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415195