https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298941 The Commission identified a prima facie case of abuse of dominant position by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) under Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act. It directed the Director General to conduct a detailed investigation within 60 days. The investigation aims to determine whether BCCI's actions, including denying market access to the Indian Cricket League (ICL) and excluding the Informant from bidding for media rights, constitute violations of the Act. The Commission's decision highlights concerns about BCCI's conduct in maintaining its monopoly and restricting competition in the cricket market. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298941 The Commission identified a prima facie case of abuse of dominant position by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) under Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act. It directed the Director General to conduct a detailed investigation within 60 days. The investigation aims to determine whether BCCI's actions, including denying market access to the Indian Cricket League (ICL) and excluding the Informant from bidding for media rights, constitute violations of the Act. The Commission's decision highlights concerns about BCCI's conduct in maintaining its monopoly and restricting competition in the cricket market. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298941