https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298934 A receiver appointed under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC may, by necessary implication, have authority to manage and preserve property where the appointment orders and surrounding directions show that scope. In the stated facts, the receiver's role covered preservation as well as rent collection and account maintenance, and the earlier functions of a person who was both mutwalli and receiver were treated as merged into the receivership. Because the property was in custodia legis, prior leave of court was required for important management acts and related expenditure, even if the power was implied. However, failure to obtain prior leave, by itself, was not enough to justify removal from office. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:22:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298934 A receiver appointed under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC may, by necessary implication, have authority to manage and preserve property where the appointment orders and surrounding directions show that scope. In the stated facts, the receiver's role covered preservation as well as rent collection and account maintenance, and the earlier functions of a person who was both mutwalli and receiver were treated as merged into the receivership. Because the property was in custodia legis, prior leave of court was required for important management acts and related expenditure, even if the power was implied. However, failure to obtain prior leave, by itself, was not enough to justify removal from office. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298934