https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298929 An original sanad that expressly conveyed the village, read with a confirming inam title deed that did not exclude the tank-bed lands, supported the conclusion that those lands passed under the grant to the agraharamdars. The inam register excluded certain specified items, but not the tank-beds, and long, continuous possession with acts of ownership further reinforced the title claim. A prior decree did not create res judicata because it had not actually decided ownership of the tank-bed lands. Limitation also did not defeat the claim, as the refund action was filed within six months of levy and a mere repudiation of title did not require an immediate declaratory suit. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:58:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298929 An original sanad that expressly conveyed the village, read with a confirming inam title deed that did not exclude the tank-bed lands, supported the conclusion that those lands passed under the grant to the agraharamdars. The inam register excluded certain specified items, but not the tank-beds, and long, continuous possession with acts of ownership further reinforced the title claim. A prior decree did not create res judicata because it had not actually decided ownership of the tank-bed lands. Limitation also did not defeat the claim, as the refund action was filed within six months of levy and a mere repudiation of title did not require an immediate declaratory suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298929