<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 327 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298927</link>
    <description>A suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership and avoidance of a registered sale deed must be brought within three years from the date the right to seek cancellation accrues or the document becomes known. Where the plaintiff had long knowledge of the deed and had earlier withdrawn a suit on the same subject, the claim was time-barred. A registered instrument continues to bind the parties until it is set aside by a proper declaration, and a bare plea that the deed was void does not dispense with the need for that relief. The challenge therefore failed because it was instituted beyond limitation and no valid basis for avoidance was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 327 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298927</link>
      <description>A suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership and avoidance of a registered sale deed must be brought within three years from the date the right to seek cancellation accrues or the document becomes known. Where the plaintiff had long knowledge of the deed and had earlier withdrawn a suit on the same subject, the claim was time-barred. A registered instrument continues to bind the parties until it is set aside by a proper declaration, and a bare plea that the deed was void does not dispense with the need for that relief. The challenge therefore failed because it was instituted beyond limitation and no valid basis for avoidance was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>