<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 616 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298926</link>
    <description>The Board canceled the allotment of 426 shares to the 4th respondent, reinstated the petitioners as directors, and annulled the appointment of the 4th respondent as a whole-time director. The original shareholding structure and Board composition were restored. Parties were advised to settle disputes amicably within a month, with binding options for settlement. Failure to choose an option would result in the petition being deemed disposed of by the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 616 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298926</link>
      <description>The Board canceled the allotment of 426 shares to the 4th respondent, reinstated the petitioners as directors, and annulled the appointment of the 4th respondent as a whole-time director. The original shareholding structure and Board composition were restored. Parties were advised to settle disputes amicably within a month, with binding options for settlement. Failure to choose an option would result in the petition being deemed disposed of by the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>