<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 925 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415144</link>
    <description>Guarantee commission paid by a State Government undertaking to the Government of Karnataka was analysed under section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision was held to apply only to royalty, licence fee, service fee, privilege fee, service charge or similar levies imposed exclusively on a State Government undertaking by the State Government. The commission here arose as contractual consideration for guarantees issued under the Karnataka Ceiling on Government Guarantees Act, 1999, not as a compulsory statutory levy, and it was not shown to be an exclusive charge on the assessee. The disallowance was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 925 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415144</link>
      <description>Guarantee commission paid by a State Government undertaking to the Government of Karnataka was analysed under section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision was held to apply only to royalty, licence fee, service fee, privilege fee, service charge or similar levies imposed exclusively on a State Government undertaking by the State Government. The commission here arose as contractual consideration for guarantees issued under the Karnataka Ceiling on Government Guarantees Act, 1999, not as a compulsory statutory levy, and it was not shown to be an exclusive charge on the assessee. The disallowance was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>