<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 920 - ITAT PANJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the search initiated under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act and the validity of assessments under section 153A. It dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals, confirming the search warrant&#039;s execution against the assessee company and the deletion of additions under section 69C. The Tribunal found the explanations provided satisfactory and lacked concrete evidence of unexplained expenditures, in line with the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 920 - ITAT PANJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the search initiated under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act and the validity of assessments under section 153A. It dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals, confirming the search warrant&#039;s execution against the assessee company and the deletion of additions under section 69C. The Tribunal found the explanations provided satisfactory and lacked concrete evidence of unexplained expenditures, in line with the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>