<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 919 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal challenging the second assessment order by A.O. ward 32(2) for the A.Y. 2010-2011. The Tribunal held that two assessments by different Assessing Officers for the same Assessee and assessment year were impermissible, rendering the second assessment order invalid. The decision underscored the legal principle that there cannot be two different assessment orders for the same assessee for the same assessment year. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the second assessment order, ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 919 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal challenging the second assessment order by A.O. ward 32(2) for the A.Y. 2010-2011. The Tribunal held that two assessments by different Assessing Officers for the same Assessee and assessment year were impermissible, rendering the second assessment order invalid. The decision underscored the legal principle that there cannot be two different assessment orders for the same assessee for the same assessment year. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the second assessment order, ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>