<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 900 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415119</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the legality and validity of the summons and show cause notices issued by the respondent. It was held that the officers of DGCEI had the jurisdiction to conduct the proceedings, and the petitioners were directed to respond to the show cause notice and participate in the proceedings as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:46:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 900 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415119</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the legality and validity of the summons and show cause notices issued by the respondent. It was held that the officers of DGCEI had the jurisdiction to conduct the proceedings, and the petitioners were directed to respond to the show cause notice and participate in the proceedings as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>