<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 897 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an independent contractor engaged in manufacturing activity at the service recipient&#039;s premises does not amount to supply of manpower and recruitment services, based on previous Tribunal judgments. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the decision emphasizing the importance of precedent in legal interpretations and the principle of stare decisis for consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 897 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an independent contractor engaged in manufacturing activity at the service recipient&#039;s premises does not amount to supply of manpower and recruitment services, based on previous Tribunal judgments. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the decision emphasizing the importance of precedent in legal interpretations and the principle of stare decisis for consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>